Ant-Man Quantumania: Did it Live Up to the Buzz?
A Bug’s Life has never been seen quite like this one’s.
As Marvel continues to produce more and more sequels out of the big mouse’s stuttering machine, the quality of screenwriting has diminished significantly. I’ve spoken to several friends and movie-goers in the past weeks, many of whom have either walked out of the recent superhero films or regretted their experiences. Today, we’re going to dive into what went wrong for the bug that always seems to get away. Like always, watch out for spoilers ahead, and if you haven’t seen the movie, well, I don’t recommend seeing it anyway (unless you’re a diehard Paul Rudd fan like myself).
The Ant-Man films tend to nail the world-building elements without a hitch every single release. Cinematographer Bill Pope, known for his collaborations with the infamous Sam Raimi (director of Toby Maguire’s Spiderman), has an excellent sense of identifying what the audience is looking for versus what angles and colors can compliment the movie’s plot. Throughout the film, we see several beautiful shots of the world “Quantumania”, a dystopian interpretation of a sector of the universe where time does not exist. Specifically, there’s one incredible moment where the skyline of the main city is panned out, directly juxtaposing the San Francisco skyline which Russ’s character, Scott Lang, is accustomed to. These details, in addition to the plethora of new alien-like characters introduced to Marvel fans, aren’t just attributed to an amazing use of cinematography. Ant-Man’s VFX team, overviewed by Jesse James Chisholm and Dave Hodgins, did an immensely successful job at bringing well-known comic characters to life such as M.O.D.O.K. and the notorious Kang the Conqueror, truly embodying what Marvel intended on creating all those years ago with Iron Man (2008). As much as I wish these elements carried the entirety of the film, the buzz eventually died out when it came to Ant-Man’s writing.
Additionally, I want to point out a notable script success: Kang. His transition as someone I felt like pitying, to an evil being I end up resenting, was absolutely magnificent; in fact, it made me extremely thrilled for what is to come with his role in Avengers: the Kang Dynasty. However, this feat was essentially overshadowed by the writers’ lack of attention to detail when writing the movie.
The movie places a large emphasis on Michelle Pfieffer’s character in this film, Janet Van Dyne. A veteran at the ol’ timeline-hopping adventure, Van Dyne is put on trial for her contribution to the genocide of a large number of species in the Quantum Realm, specifically in helping Kang the Conqueror. It’s revealed that she ultimately tried stopping the villain rather than the image bestowed upon her by the locals, but there is a much larger question that comes to play here. In a scene about halfway through the movie where the gang is at an alien bar discussing Janet’s time in the quantum realm, the mother reveals that she’d been down there for 30 years, QUANTUM time. Based on the data Marvel has put forth in other movies, this logic wouldn’t be plausible; this, along with several other loopholes in the film, made for an overall unpleasant movie-going experience in terms of following along with the plot.
The future of our favorite superheroes has been predetermined, not by factors like fan service and critics’ opinions, but rather, by a quantity-over-quality system prioritizing profits over story-building. Ant-Man is just one of many recent Marvel films of the past year to bug audiences, and this trend doesn’t seem to be stopping. So, that begs the question that’s been swarming the minds of Marvel fans across the globe: did it live up to the buzz? To that, I’ll leave you with a quote from Scott Lang himself:
“So... does anyone have any orange slices?”
Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed, check out my latest articles below: